Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The APACHE IV scoring system is a validated tool for ICU mortality prediction and resource management. However, its underutilization due to staffing and technological constraints reduces its effectiveness in critical care settings.


Objectives: This project aimed to increase timely APACHE IV score completion, improve score accuracy, align actual outcomes with predicted values, and integrate scoring into routine ICU decision-making.


Methods: A prospective, unit-based process improvement project was implemented over four months (Dec 2024–Mar 2025) in the ICU. Interventions included staff training, EMR integration, compliance dashboards, and sepsis subgroup analysis.


Results: Completion rates of APACHE IV within 24 hours improved from 30% to >80%. ALOS remained below predicted ELS across risk categories. Sepsis EMR peaked at 58% in February but declined by 46% in March. ICU mortality and resource utilization trends improved despite persistent staffing challenges.


Conclusion: Timely APACHE IV implementation enhances ICU performance, enabling better outcome prediction and resource planning. Continued education, staffing support, and automation are vital for sustainability.

Keywords

ECG interpretation, emergency department, healthcare education, competence assessment, quality improvement, cardiac emergencies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Angel G Joseph, Mubarak Hanyan Almasan, Hind Ali-Suwasis, Viji Christudass, & Mriamma Thomas. (2025). Strengthening ICU Outcomes through Enhanced APACHE IV Score Implementation and Monitoring. International Journal of Research in Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics, 14(2), 507-210. Retrieved from https://ijrpp.com/ijrpp/article/view/693

References

  1. 1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1297–1310.
  2. 2. Vincent JL, Moreno R. Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):207.
  3. 3. Ministry of Health (Saudi Arabia). National ICU Guidelines for Risk Scoring and Monitoring. Riyadh: MOH; 2023.
  4. 4. Keegan MT, Gajic O, Afessa B. Severity of illness scoring systems in the ICU. Crit Care Clin. 2011;27(3):453–475.