Main Article Content

Abstract

Background


A Generic drug is a pharmaceutical product usually intended to be interchangeable with an innovator product that is manufactured without any license from the innovator company and marketed after the expiry date of the patent or other exclusive rights. The generic drug can be equivalent to branded formulations if they have the same pharmaceutical form, therapeutic indications and similar bioequivalence [20%]. There is an increased report of adverse events against the active drug ingredient of the generic drugs. Many of these factors lead to the increased confusion in the medical field on prescribing drugs. The antimicrobial resistance is a global problem, probably due to the indiscriminate and irrational use of antibiotics, prescriptions for incorrect medicines or incorrect determinations of dose, route and/or duration [16].  Antibiotics are type of antimicrobial drugs used in the treatment and prevention of bacterial infections. There is increased incidence of resistance against many antibiotics which contributes to the serious emerging and re emerging infections. In this study the antibacterial activities of different generic and branded amikacin were compared againstescherichia coli -In vitro.


Methods


In this experiment one generic amikacin (mikastar) and five branded amikacin were taken and coded. The urine samples of the patient with UTI were collected in the hospital under aseptic precautions and the E.colicoloniessensitive to amikacin were isolated by using antibiotic sensitivity test by means of Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method using amikacin disc and the E.coli sensitive to it were isolated based on the zone of inhibition to the amikacin.


 To know the antimicrobial activities of the drug, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antibiotics were calculated by using serial macro broth dilution method.


Results


Based on the above experiments done, the generic and the branded antibiotics were equally efficacious against the Escherichia coli.


Conclusions


All the samples of the antibiotics taken are pharmaceutical equivalents and the products can be used in antimicrobial therapy [16].

Keywords

Branded drug Generic drug Minimal inhibitory concentration Bioequivalence Amikacin E.coli Macrobrothdilution Antibiotic sensitivity test Disc diffusion method

Article Details

How to Cite
M.SaravanaKumar, Elakiya Elango, & Sageera Banoo. (2021). An analytic comparitive study about the antimicrobial activity of different generic and branded Amikacin on Escherichia coli - an In vitro study. International Journal of Research in Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics, 8(2), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.61096/ijrpp.v8.iss2.2019.210-220

References

  1. [1]. Goodman& Gilman’s The pharmacological basis of Therapeutics edited by Laurence Brinton, brucechabner, bjornknollman. Chapter 54 Aminoglycosidesconan MacDougall & Henry F.Chambers 12, 1505 - 1516
  2. [2]. Textbook of dainostic microbiology 3rd edition edited by Connie.R.Mahon Donald C.Lehman & George Manusell. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing procedures in Antimicrobial susceptibility testing – Janet Fick Hindler, James H.Jorgensen13, 326.
  3. [3]. Topley Wilson’s microbiology & microbial infection Bacteriology edited by S.Peterborriello, Patrick R.Murray& Guido funke. CHAPTER 28 Daignosis of infection Joseph D.C.YAO, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing 1(10), 717
  4. [4]. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of infectious diseases. The clinician and the microbiology laboratory by Patrick R.Murray Frank G.Witebsky. 7(17), 326
  5. [5]. KD Tripathi Essentials of Medical Pharmacology Antimicrobial Drugs; General Considerations 7(49), 689.
  6. [6]. Ananthanarayanan&paniker’s Textbook of Microbiology Laboratory control of Antimicrobial Therapy 9(67), 635.
  7. [7]. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/nkc/files/2008_clinical_equivalence_of_generic_and_brand-name.pdf
  8. [8]. Gaither C, Kirking D, Ascione F, Welage L. Consumers’ views on generic medications. J Am Pharm Assoc. 41, 2001, 729-736.
  9. [9]. Davit et al. Comparing generic and innovator drugs: a review of 12 years of bioequivalence data from the United States Food and Drug Administration. Ann Pharmacother. 43(10), 2009, 1583-97.
  10. [10]. SAVINGS An Economic Analysis of Generic Drug Usage in the U.S., GPhA, 2011, 1.
  11. [11]. Generic versus branded medicines: An observational study among patients with chronic diseases attending a public hospital outpatient departmentJ Nat SciBiol Medv. 8(1), 2017, PMC5320819.
  12. [12]. Shrank W, Cox E, Fischer MA, Mehta J, Choudhry NK. Patient perceptions of generic medications. Health Aff. In press
  13. [13]. Kesselheim et al. Clinical equivalence of generic and brand name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 300(21), 2008, 2514-2526.
  14. [14]. Physician perceptions about generic drugsShrank WH1, Liberman JN, Fischer MA, Girdish C, Brennan TA, Choudhry NK.
  15. [15]. Generic versus branded medicines: An observational study among patients with chronic diseases attending a public hospital outpatient department, Manisha Das, Supriyo Choudhury, Somnath Maity, Avijit Hazra,1 Tirthankar Pradhan,2 Aishee Pal,2 and Ranendra Kumar Roy.
  16. [16]. In vitro Comparison of Generic and Branded Preparations of Amoxicillin with Potassium ClavulanatePriyankaPathak 1 and Jayshree Dawane2
  17. [17]. Comparative in vitro study of the antimicrobialactivities of different commercial antibioticproducts for intravenous administrationEdelberto Silva*†, Jorge A Díaz†, María J Arias, Angela P Hernández, Andrés de la Torre.